Most scalpers try to benefit from price patterns in trading the  markets. Those who like calmer markets choose to exploit formations like  triangles and flags, while those who prefer trading the news tend to be  active during breakouts. There’s no single type of market where  scalping can be applied to best benefit, because there are many  different kinds of scalpers. But there are some technical patterns which  offer their greatest benefits to a scalping strategy, and those are the  patterns which we’ll examine here.
First we’ll take a look at scalping during breakouts, and then study  ranges. Afterwards we’ll discuss trend-scalping with fibonacci levels  under a separate heading.
a. News Breakouts
The most typical and significant breakouts observed on any trading  day are those associated with important news releases, regardless of  their nature. Volatility maybe caused by an unexpected government  announcement, at other times a surprising result from a statistical  release, and sometimes a mundane piece of data which the markets choose  to interpret in an agitated manner. The characteristic of these events  is a rapid rise in volatility: a strong initial movement which then has  aftershocks, so to speak, lasting over hours and generating swings and  fluctuations which are then exploited by scalpers. Scalping in the  aftermath of news releases is different from scalping in stale, range  bound conditions with respect to its stop-loss requirement, the average  life of a trade, and the necessary risk controls.
Although this kind of scalping has some resemblance to fundamental  trading, in fact it is a purely technical approach, and has little to do  with the real nature or significance of the news or data releases. It  is not possible to fully evaluate the meaning of a piece of economic  data in the ten minutes where market reaction is most intense, and as  such, there is no point in giving fundamental meanings to the market’s  behavior during the same time period. This is especially the case when  we consider that news releases are revised frequently, and sometimes  drastically following the initial release.
 In the above graph we have the hourly EURUSD chart and the  highlighted region shows the immediate price reaction to the news  release at 8 am, followed by its subsequent legs. As soon as the  important piece of news was released the market generated a rapidly  increasing momentum which never gave traders a chance to look back. The  maximum value around 1.4290 was also the opening price of the hourly  bar, and it was never revisited. It is easy to conjecture that soon  after the release, and in the period immediately preceding it, spreads  had widened significantly, and opportunities for scalping were limited.  Yet, right after the news release liquidity came gushing back to the  market, as traders hastened to readjust their positions. Favorable  conditions for scalping would exist within about ten minutes after the  news release.
The most important rule while exploiting a news breakout is to stay  away from the market during the short period around the news release  itself. Unless one is using automated tools for scalping, this brief  period is too agitated, and chaotic to allow informed decisions. Worse  yet, in the short term the brief but powerful widening of spreads makes  technical planning an insurmountable task at times. Instead, a  successful scalper will use this brief period to identify the possible  direction of the market before entering positions in accordance.
In the example above, we’d be able to scalp the market for a  four-hour long period, during the four red candles in the highlighted  area. The best way to ensure against suffering losses in the volatility  of this period is using a reasonably tight stop with a somewhat looser  take-profit order. In example, if we open a short position at around  1.4250 during the third hour, with a 3-pip spread cost to be paid to the  broker, we’ll place our stop loss at 1.4255, while our take profit  order will be at around 1.4240. This would ensure a 2:1 risk-reward  ratio for the position being maintained.
It is a good idea to add a time-stop to a scalping position as well.  What is a time stop? This is a kind of stop order which will close a  position once a certain period of time is reached, regardless of the  amount of profit or loss involved (although of course, both the  potential loss or profit are less than what would be indicated by the  stop-loss or take profit orders). For example, in our previous example,  we had placed our stop loss at 1.4255, while our take profit order was  at 1.4240. When we add the time-stop to our initial order at, say, 2  minutes, we’ll close and exit our position two minutes after its opening  regardless of the profit or loss involved in the trade.
Why do we use the time stop? We had defined previously that as  scalpers we don’t want to be exposed to the markets for a long time. But  the market does not need to listen to our expectations, and might as  well refuse to hit both the stop-loss and take-profit points for a long  of period (at least in the terms of the scalper). The longer we expose  ourselves to market moves, the greater the risk of a sudden, sharp  movement against our expectations. In order to prevent being caught in  such an indecisive, but also dangerous market, we use to time stop as a  safety valve allowing us to bail out of our positions if things don’t  turn out as we had initially expected.
Scalping of news breakouts can be very profitable, because all the  ideal conditions required by scalpers are present. The swift, large,  moves which occur in the brief timeframe during which scalpers are  willing to expose themselves to the market allow the formulation of  profitable forex scalping strategies.
In the above graph we have the hourly EURUSD chart and the  highlighted region shows the immediate price reaction to the news  release at 8 am, followed by its subsequent legs. As soon as the  important piece of news was released the market generated a rapidly  increasing momentum which never gave traders a chance to look back. The  maximum value around 1.4290 was also the opening price of the hourly  bar, and it was never revisited. It is easy to conjecture that soon  after the release, and in the period immediately preceding it, spreads  had widened significantly, and opportunities for scalping were limited.  Yet, right after the news release liquidity came gushing back to the  market, as traders hastened to readjust their positions. Favorable  conditions for scalping would exist within about ten minutes after the  news release.
The most important rule while exploiting a news breakout is to stay  away from the market during the short period around the news release  itself. Unless one is using automated tools for scalping, this brief  period is too agitated, and chaotic to allow informed decisions. Worse  yet, in the short term the brief but powerful widening of spreads makes  technical planning an insurmountable task at times. Instead, a  successful scalper will use this brief period to identify the possible  direction of the market before entering positions in accordance.
In the example above, we’d be able to scalp the market for a  four-hour long period, during the four red candles in the highlighted  area. The best way to ensure against suffering losses in the volatility  of this period is using a reasonably tight stop with a somewhat looser  take-profit order. In example, if we open a short position at around  1.4250 during the third hour, with a 3-pip spread cost to be paid to the  broker, we’ll place our stop loss at 1.4255, while our take profit  order will be at around 1.4240. This would ensure a 2:1 risk-reward  ratio for the position being maintained.
It is a good idea to add a time-stop to a scalping position as well.  What is a time stop? This is a kind of stop order which will close a  position once a certain period of time is reached, regardless of the  amount of profit or loss involved (although of course, both the  potential loss or profit are less than what would be indicated by the  stop-loss or take profit orders). For example, in our previous example,  we had placed our stop loss at 1.4255, while our take profit order was  at 1.4240. When we add the time-stop to our initial order at, say, 2  minutes, we’ll close and exit our position two minutes after its opening  regardless of the profit or loss involved in the trade.
Why do we use the time stop? We had defined previously that as  scalpers we don’t want to be exposed to the markets for a long time. But  the market does not need to listen to our expectations, and might as  well refuse to hit both the stop-loss and take-profit points for a long  of period (at least in the terms of the scalper). The longer we expose  ourselves to market moves, the greater the risk of a sudden, sharp  movement against our expectations. In order to prevent being caught in  such an indecisive, but also dangerous market, we use to time stop as a  safety valve allowing us to bail out of our positions if things don’t  turn out as we had initially expected.
Scalping of news breakouts can be very profitable, because all the  ideal conditions required by scalpers are present. The swift, large,  moves which occur in the brief timeframe during which scalpers are  willing to expose themselves to the market allow the formulation of  profitable forex scalping strategies.
b. Technical breakouts
What we term a technical breakout is the case where a range breaks  down without any obvious news catalyst. News are released continuously  all over the world during the trading day, and although it is often  possible to tie a piece of the price action arbitrarily to a piece of  news being released somewhere in the world, it is not always practical  to identify what causes what in the chaotic trading environment with any  certainty or exactitude. These seemingly inexplicable, sudden and  difficult to predict breakouts will be termed technical breakouts in  this text.
Scalping this kind of breakout requires a lot more conservatism in  comparison to the scalping of the usual news breakout. There is very  little clarity as to what is causing what, and a market that is up may  soon reverse and go down with little or no warning. To avoid being  caught up in the chaos of such conditions, it is a good idea to use even  smaller trade sizes, sensible stop-loss orders,
 In this chart we see the hourly movements of the USDJPY pair confined  between 94.02 and 94.71. The highlighted area shows the region we would  like to trade. Since the established range rests between support and  resistance levels which are tested only twice, we would not have had the  opportunity to trade the range itself developing on 28-29 July for  profit, using scalping or any other method. On the other hand, we are  ready to do some scalping in order to exploit the breakout which occurs  at around 7 am on 29th July.
The volatile nature of breakout is demonstrated by the green candle  next to the small red arrow on the chart where we see observe the  closing price of the bar only slightly above the resistance line  displayed. Scalping is suitable conditions such as these because  scalpers do not need to think long and hard about the ultimate direction  of the price. In the timeframe of a one or two hours, five, ten  minutes, the price action is more or less random, and it is not very  sensible to try to seek logical explanations for it. Scalpers can avoid  doing so, and that is their advantage in breakout scenarios, and similar  sudden and unpredictable markets.
While scalping this breakout, we’d use a chart with a shorter term,  and not the hourly graph which we see above. Fortunately, the fractal  nature of price charts allows us to trade a 5-minute chart in a way the  same way that we trade a 5-month chart; the scalper only needs to apply  the general rules of technical trading to the shorter time frame. The  key issue is making sure that you’re on board the trend, or in harmony  with the phase of the range pattern (up, or down) while scalping.
In this chart we see the hourly movements of the USDJPY pair confined  between 94.02 and 94.71. The highlighted area shows the region we would  like to trade. Since the established range rests between support and  resistance levels which are tested only twice, we would not have had the  opportunity to trade the range itself developing on 28-29 July for  profit, using scalping or any other method. On the other hand, we are  ready to do some scalping in order to exploit the breakout which occurs  at around 7 am on 29th July.
The volatile nature of breakout is demonstrated by the green candle  next to the small red arrow on the chart where we see observe the  closing price of the bar only slightly above the resistance line  displayed. Scalping is suitable conditions such as these because  scalpers do not need to think long and hard about the ultimate direction  of the price. In the timeframe of a one or two hours, five, ten  minutes, the price action is more or less random, and it is not very  sensible to try to seek logical explanations for it. Scalpers can avoid  doing so, and that is their advantage in breakout scenarios, and similar  sudden and unpredictable markets.
While scalping this breakout, we’d use a chart with a shorter term,  and not the hourly graph which we see above. Fortunately, the fractal  nature of price charts allows us to trade a 5-minute chart in a way the  same way that we trade a 5-month chart; the scalper only needs to apply  the general rules of technical trading to the shorter time frame. The  key issue is making sure that you’re on board the trend, or in harmony  with the phase of the range pattern (up, or down) while scalping.
c. range Patterns
A scalper trading a range pattern will try to identify the time  periods and price patterns where activity is most subdued, and will  exploit them for profit. We have already discussed some of the general  concepts in trading ranges, here we’ll try to apply them in greater  detail.
Price charts are similar to fractals. They are self-similar at  multiple time periods, with a price range at 30 minutes sometimes  accompanied by a trend on a 30 second chart. While trading ranges  scalpers must keep both the hourly, and the minutely price events in  mind. We’ll use hourly charts to ensure that overall activity in the  market is subdued, while using the short term price action to identify  and trade profitable periods.
 The hourly chart of the USDCHF pair presents an interesting scenario  for scalpers. A large hourly range lasting for a number of days is  coupled to fairly strong directional movements requiring some trend  following skills for successful exploitation.
At this stage, observing the price action in the chart, we must ask  ourselves the question: can we determine the severity of short-term  volatility by examining charts which show long term activity? The answer  is no. Although we can determine the ultimate direction of short term  price movements by examining long term charts, volatility on an hourly  chart, for example, does not need to be duplicated on a short term chart  exactly. The price may move 100-pips in the course of an hour, and the  chart would show a large green candlestick, but all that large movement  could have happened in the last ten minutes of trading, with the  previous fifty minutes presenting choppy, and boring conditions. In  other words, the scalper must concentrate on the time period before him,  especially if he is aiming to exploit random price movements that go  nowhere (as in range trading), in contrast to scalping a strong  directional trend. In the latter, the perspective provided by long term  charts may be helpful, but in range scalping utmost attention must be  devoted to the 1-minute, 5-minute graph which is being traded.
In the graph above the price is confined between 1.0654, and 1.0741.  The three red arrows show us the opportunities where we can be confident  that the range will hold: when the resistance line is tested for the  third time, we will consider this an opportunity for sell-side scalping.  When, at around 27th July 5 am the price rebounds from the support line  for a second time, and later for a third, we’ll regard the market  conditions as being ideal for establishing long positions repeatedly.
The hourly chart of the USDCHF pair presents an interesting scenario  for scalpers. A large hourly range lasting for a number of days is  coupled to fairly strong directional movements requiring some trend  following skills for successful exploitation.
At this stage, observing the price action in the chart, we must ask  ourselves the question: can we determine the severity of short-term  volatility by examining charts which show long term activity? The answer  is no. Although we can determine the ultimate direction of short term  price movements by examining long term charts, volatility on an hourly  chart, for example, does not need to be duplicated on a short term chart  exactly. The price may move 100-pips in the course of an hour, and the  chart would show a large green candlestick, but all that large movement  could have happened in the last ten minutes of trading, with the  previous fifty minutes presenting choppy, and boring conditions. In  other words, the scalper must concentrate on the time period before him,  especially if he is aiming to exploit random price movements that go  nowhere (as in range trading), in contrast to scalping a strong  directional trend. In the latter, the perspective provided by long term  charts may be helpful, but in range scalping utmost attention must be  devoted to the 1-minute, 5-minute graph which is being traded.
In the graph above the price is confined between 1.0654, and 1.0741.  The three red arrows show us the opportunities where we can be confident  that the range will hold: when the resistance line is tested for the  third time, we will consider this an opportunity for sell-side scalping.  When, at around 27th July 5 am the price rebounds from the support line  for a second time, and later for a third, we’ll regard the market  conditions as being ideal for establishing long positions repeatedly.
d. Flags
Many scalpers prefer to exploit range patterns as they present quiet,  tame conditions where various strategies can be utilizied without the  danger of large losses which would arise in conditions of high  volatility. Scalpers who thrive in these conditions have no great  expectations from individual trades, and are perfectly content with  unexciting, slow markets where “nothing is going on”, from the point of  view of a trend follower. In spite of the brief lifetime, and small  profit of individual trades, great gains are realized as profits of  several hours are combined at the end of the trading day.
 In this fifteen minute chart of the USDCHF pair we observe a strong  hourly trend only briefly interrupted by the highlighted flags. Although  the formations are not perfect, they are perfect as continuation  patterns, and present quite, subdued periods where the scalper can test  his skills. Of the three flags highlighted in this chart, the first and  the third are the tamest, and the easiest to exploit. In both of these  the price moves up and down in a simple range, and doesn’t possess  directionality.
How does the trader exploit this situation? In essence we’ll regard  the flags as small range patterns the upper and lower bound of which can  be used as trigger points telling us to reverse the direction of our  trade. When the price rises and approaches the upper edge of the flag,  we won’t trade, but wait until it is reversed and a sell order is  possible (we don’t want to enter a sell order immediately because of the  possibility of a breakout). After that we’ll enter and exit small and  quick sell orders trying to exploit the established range pattern.  Conversely, when the price falls and touches the lower bound of the flag  pattern, we’ll wait until it begins to rise again, and then we’ll scalp  the market with buy orders.
It is quite simple and easy to scalp the market when there are flags  appearing. But flags are very strong continuation patterns, and we must  be careful not to get caught in the breakout when the flag pattern  dissipates and gives way to the momentum of the main trend.
Triangles can be traded in the same manner as well, and any  consolidation pattern can be used for scalping within the range  established. As we mentioned before, the rules of range trading can be  applied, along with the appropriate strategies, while using the  necessary risk controls inside the preferred brief time frame of  scalpers.
In this fifteen minute chart of the USDCHF pair we observe a strong  hourly trend only briefly interrupted by the highlighted flags. Although  the formations are not perfect, they are perfect as continuation  patterns, and present quite, subdued periods where the scalper can test  his skills. Of the three flags highlighted in this chart, the first and  the third are the tamest, and the easiest to exploit. In both of these  the price moves up and down in a simple range, and doesn’t possess  directionality.
How does the trader exploit this situation? In essence we’ll regard  the flags as small range patterns the upper and lower bound of which can  be used as trigger points telling us to reverse the direction of our  trade. When the price rises and approaches the upper edge of the flag,  we won’t trade, but wait until it is reversed and a sell order is  possible (we don’t want to enter a sell order immediately because of the  possibility of a breakout). After that we’ll enter and exit small and  quick sell orders trying to exploit the established range pattern.  Conversely, when the price falls and touches the lower bound of the flag  pattern, we’ll wait until it begins to rise again, and then we’ll scalp  the market with buy orders.
It is quite simple and easy to scalp the market when there are flags  appearing. But flags are very strong continuation patterns, and we must  be careful not to get caught in the breakout when the flag pattern  dissipates and gives way to the momentum of the main trend.
Triangles can be traded in the same manner as well, and any  consolidation pattern can be used for scalping within the range  established. As we mentioned before, the rules of range trading can be  applied, along with the appropriate strategies, while using the  necessary risk controls inside the preferred brief time frame of  scalpers.
 
 
 
It is possible to think of scalping in two different ways. In one  approach, the trader is concerned purely with the slow price  fluctuations that occur in a short period time, and uses technical  methods to trade them. In the other approach the scalper can also be a  trend follower, or a swing trader, but he uses very small, fast trades  as a rule. The latter approach tells the trader to exploit rapid and  sharp price movements, while maintaining an eye on the overall market  direction in order to control risk exposure. The first approach, on the  other hand, requires that the trader benefit from slow, and small price  movements which go nowhere: while the price is moving slowly up and  down, it will generally return to where it left, and it is possible to  trade it without taking great risks.
In this section we’ll take a look at both approaches. We’ll discuss  the pure scalping approach in the context of ranging markets where  volatility is the main method for generating profits. We’ll also examine  the combined approach while studying the subject of scalping with the  Fibonacci extensions in trending markets. Let’s note here that technical  strategies that can be applied in day , or swing trading are equally  valid in scalping as well, and that there’s no difference (apart from  the role of the spread) between a 5-minute or 5-month chart as far as  analysis is concerned. The reader is invited to read about technical  indicators and strategies here.
Before going on further and discussing the details of the subject,  however, we wish to say a few words on the psychological aspect of  scalping. As we mentioned before, scalping is an emotionally intense  activity where the trader must keep calm nerves in the face all kinds of  unexpected events. Clearly, overcoming these issues and maintaining a  consistent and disciplined approach to trading is a precondition to  achieving any kind of profit in the forex market. So how does the trader  achieve this necessary degree of emotional restraint and composure?
People remain calm and composed in conditions with which they are  familiar and knowledgeable about. Most of us are disturbed if a car  makes a sudden movement, but are not bothered while an airplane is  taking off with great momentum and speed. Similarly, the same person can  perceive anxiety by a small unexpected cut on a finger, yet feel  relatively composed while heading to the hospital in order to be  operated on by a surgeon. In other words, our emotional responses to  risky activities and disturbing conditions are not entirely dependent on  the nature of what is being experienced, but more on what is being  perceived by us.
As such, in order to be successful a scalper must accustom himself to  market conditions in such a way that losses and profits in the markets  are expected and acceptable. We need to convince ourselves, and teach  that there is no danger, so that we can trade with confidence. Needless  to say, if there are real causes for concern, fear is appropriate. If we  are risking more than we should, taking too much leverage, or don’t  know what we are doing, we’ll feel nervous, timid, and insecure about  our trading decisions. In that case, the first step is ensuring that we  are not taking unnecessary risks. It is difficult for scared money to  profit, and even more so in scalping, therefore, we need eliminate the  logical causes of fear from our practice.
If after removing such causes we still feel nervous and worried about  what we are doing, it is necessary to take additional steps to deal  with the causes of our irrational perceptions. These steps should  involve the automation of our tactics. The suggestion for scalpers is to  begin this learning process with very small sums which are then  increased and combined as experience allows greater, healthier returns.  Since at the earliest stages the purpose is not to make profits, but  gaining experience, small accounts with minimal leverage are necessary.  There is very little point in worrying about a small loss if by  realizing it we are gaining important lessons about what should and  should not be done in the markets. By being accustomed to difficult  market conditions which accompany scalping in the markets, we can  prepare ourselves for the ultimate challenge of trading significant sums  in the forex market. As we like to say, no body can leap to the top of a  mountain or a skyscraper, but by climbing on rocks, or using the stairs  many people are capable of realizing such an seemingly impossible deed.
 
 
 
In scalping, the time period preferred will depend on the technical  strategy employed. Some scalpers prefer choppy, directionless markets  when utilizing this style, while others prefer to trade strongly  directional, highly liquid and volatile markets. This choice is mostly a  matter of personal preference, but the two kinds of markets do offer  different environments where different strategies will bear greater  profit. In this section we will not discuss the methods, but will  consider the time periods when a particular approach is likely to bear  the best results.
Also let’s add here that a scalper is under no logical obligation to  exit a trade if there is enough reason to believe that holding it a  while longer may be profitable. The rules that should not be broken are  about money and risk management, and there is nothing iron-solid about  trading styles. Although in general scalpers should liquidate their  positions rapidly in order to maintain consistency, there is no rule  which forbids the combining of several trading styles by the same  trader. It is common that during the most volatile periods of trading,  positions held longer than what is common with scalping can be more  beneficial and prudent. If that is the case, there is no reason to avoid  doing so just because the trader considers himself a pure scalper, so  to speak.
Throughout this text, all times are ET (New York time).
7:00-8:00 am
This is the time period when European markets often experience choppy  conditions as traders prepare for the opening of the New York market at  8 am. Since there are option expiries and news releases in this time  period, and statistical releases of the European session (which are  released around 4 am) have already been absorbed, most traders choose to  sit back and reconsider their strategies before North American players  enter the forex game. The London and Frankfurt markets are both open at  this time, but liquidity lessens as trading desks reduce gear.
Scalpers preferring choppy conditions may find an excellent  environment for practicing their skills and refining their talents  during this period. Since the market is choppy, strategies that aim to  exploit small oscillations in the price to either side can be applied  effectively and consistently. It is important to remember, however, that  in some cases some anticipated economic event may make the market  agitated and stir the water more than what is appreciated by the  scalper.
This period is a more volatile version of the last two hours before  the North American market close around 7 am. Let’s also note that  sometimes the pre-news release volatility in the market can assume a  directional character as prices rise or fall significantly but slowly  over the one and a half hours preceding the 8:30 release. In spite of  the directionality, the slow nature of the price movement can make  scalping a favorable option over a buy-and-hold strategy in the period  leading to the release. Triangles are common, and it is possible to  scalp them by remaining in side the range implied by the triangle.
8:00-10:00 am
During this period, the New York, London, and Frankfurt markets are  all open; there are a number of important news releases, and option  expiries also take place. As such, this is by far the most liquid and  volatile period of the trading day, and requires appropriate scalping  strategies for exploitation.
During these two hours micro-trends proliferate, in other words,  rapid and sharp directional swings are commonplace as many market events  and news releases stir the waters of the forex market repeatedly. In  order to exploit these movements effectively, the scalper must possess a  reliable technical approach which can be used to exploit rapidly  changing conditions. Although we will discuss the technical aspects of  trend scalping later, we will mention the importance of building up  positions and letting profits run, if possible, in this highly trending  market. Of course, scalping involves rapid opening and closing of  positions, but unless we let profits run in the sharp moves encountered  during this period, the rapid swings that cause us lossess will be able  to erase whatever profit we gain with other positions. It is a good idea  to be alert, and if caught in the middle of a strong trend which we  have guessed correctly, there’s no reason to avoid exploiting it to the  full.
If we decide to build up positions in this period, we may move  stop-losses gradually to breakeven for our trades so that some of them  can be left to run for as long as they can. Since the stop-loss will  generate a profit even if it is activated, we can go ahead and continue  our scalping while the positions which are safe continue running.
3:00-7:00 pm
This period can itself be divided into two separate phases. Between  3pm and 5pm, many banks in the U.S. are still open, but they are closing  gradually as the day progresses. The period between 5 pm and 7 pm is  the quietest part of the trading day. Almost all major markets are  closed, and while trading is still continuing, activity is subdued  significantly. This is the golden sixth of the scalper who prefers calm,  and slow markets where small, directionless oscillations can be  exploited with great effectiveness. During this one sixth of the trading  day, scalping strategies can be employed both manually, and through  automation by traders who seek rapid and low risk profits.
The first part between 3-5 pm is more suitable to scalpers who prefer  some volatility in the markets in order to realize more sizable  profits. On the other hand, since many banks in the U.S. are still open  during this period, volatility and risk are somewhat higher than the  following period. Between 5-7 pm, on the other hand, almost all major  banks in the developed world are closed, and extremely choppy, quiet  conditions prevail.
The best way to scalp in these conditions is to use very small and  rapid trades, and avoid building up positions. Since directionality in  such choppy conditions is unlikely, there is little point in  accumulating positions, and tampering with take-profit or stop-loss  orders. Quick, multiple trades taken in quick succession without much  consideration given to the overall conditions in the market constitute  the favored approach of traders during this time period.
 
 
 
Scalping is a highly specialized activity which requires a favorable  technical and fundamental setup to yield its full potential. In the  previous section we examined the necessary preconditions sought from a  broker, here we’ll take a look at the currency pairs which are best  suited to scalping strategies.
In general, the best currency pairs for scalping are those that are  not prone to very sharp movements, or if they are, such movements are  less frequent. In that sense, the best group for scalping is the group  of major pairs discussed below, and among them, the most liquid and  least volatile one is the EURUSD pair.
a. Majors
This group includes pairs such as the EURUSD, the GBPUSD, the USDCHF,  and others which are formed by currencies of the most powerful and  dominant economic powers in the world. Although the JPY (Japanese Yen)  pairs can also be examined in this group, they behave differently and  we’ll examine them under the heading of carry pairs.
The main property of the majors pairs is liquidity. Their second  characteristic is relatively subdued responsiveness to market shocks. An  event which can cause a 100 pip movement in the AUDJPY pair will move  the EURUSD by 30 points usually, sometimes less. The major pairs are  traded all over the world, by almost all banks and important  institutions (since they are often reserve currencies). They are the  bulky giants of currency market in terms of trade volume, and move  slowly.
Scalpers who prefer to trade ranges, or to exploit slow, and small  movements in currency pairs for conservative profits can concentrate  their activities in the major pairs.
b. Carry pairs
Carry pairs are liquid, but volatile. Pairs such as the EURJPY or  USDJPY are traded all over the world, and trading is activity is hectic,  but they are also very volatile, because many financial actors use the  Japanese currency to borrow and invest in various risky assets. As a  result, when there is a market shock these pairs react in an excessive  fashion which is difficult to interpret for trading decisions,  especially so in the short time frame favored by scalpers.
The carry pairs are traded mostly for interest income. Although it is  possible to scalp them as well, it is not a great idea because at times  spreads widen so rapidly that even a stop-loss order cannot protect our  account from a significant loss. The sudden widening of spreads is not  unique to carry pairs, but while in the EURUSD pair it is often seen  after the non-farm payrolls release, or major interest rate decisions,  in carry pairs it is more frequent, deeper and longer lasting.
We do not advise beginners to scalp with the carry pairs. Experienced  scalpers can trade them with typical trend following strategies in  order to exploit breakouts and other sharp movements.
c. Exotic Currencies
Exotic is a term used in the options market, but we’ll use the term  to discuss the comparatively rare, less liquid, and less well-known  forex pairs which are mostly unsuitable to scalping. This group includes  such volatile pairs like NOKUSD (NOK being the Norwegian Krone), the  Russian ruble, the BRLUSD pair (with the Brazilian Real), and many other  lesser known ones.
This group is not suitable to scalping because unpredictable price  gaps are frequent, and it is difficult to use money management  strategies in the short term. Especially beginners should avoid them to  avoid getting scalped while trying to scalp the market.
 
 
 
Forex scalping is a popular method involving the quick opening and  liquidation of positions. The term “quick” is imprecise, but it is  generally meant to define a timeframe of about 3-5 minutes at most,  while most scalpers will maintain their positions for as little as one  minute.
The popularity of scalping is born of its perceived safety as a  trading style. Many traders argue that since scalpers maintain their  positions for a brief time period in comparison to regular traders,  market exposure of a scalper is much shorter than that of a trend  follower, or even a day trader, and consequently, the risk of large  losses resulting from strong market moves is smaller. Indeed, it is  possible to claim that the typical scalper cares only about the bid-ask  spread, while concepts like trend, or range are not very significant to  him. Although scalpers need ignore these market phenomena, they are  under no obligation to trade them, because they concern themselves only  with the brief periods of volatility created by them.
Forex scalping is not a suitable strategy for every type of trader.  The returns generated in each position opened by the scalper is usually  small; but great profits are made as gains from each closed small  position are combined. Scalpers do not like to take large risks, which  means that they are willing to forgo great profit opportunities in  return for the safety of small, but frequent gains. Consequently, the  scalper needs to be a patient, diligent individual who is willing to  wait as the fruits of his labors translate to great profits over time.  An impulsive, excited character who seeks instant gratification and aims  to “make it big” with each consecutive trade is unlikely to achieve  anything but frustration while using this strategy.
Scalping also demands a lot more attention from the trader in  comparison to other styles such as swing-trading, or trend following. A  typical scalper will open and close tens, and in some cases, more than a  hundred positions in an ordinary trading day, and since none of the  positions can be allowed to suffer great losses (so that we can protect  the bottom line), the scalper cannot afford to be careful about some,  and negligent about some of his positions. It may appear to be a  formidable task at first sight, but scalping can be an involving, even  fun trading style once the trader is comfortable with his practices and  habits. Still, it is clear that attentiveness and strong concentration  skills are necessary for the successful forex scalper. One does not need  to be born equipped with such talents, but practice and commitment to  achieve them are indispensable if a trader has any serious intention of  becoming a real scalper.
Scalping can be demanding, and time-consuming for those who are not  full-time traders. Many of us pursue trading merely as an additional  income source, and would not like to dedicate five six hours every day  to the practice. In order to deal with this problem, automated trading  systems have been developed, and they are being sold with rather  incredible claims all over the web. We do not advise our readers to  waste their time trying to make such strategies work for them; at best  you will lose some money while having some lessons about not trusting  anyone’s word so easily. However, if you design your own automated  systems for trading (with some guidance from seasoned experts and  self-education through practice) it may be that you shorten the time  which must be dedicated to trading while still being able to use  scalping techniques. And an automated forex scalping technique does not  need to be fully automatic; you may hand over the routine and systematic  tasks such as stop-loss and take-profit orders to the automated system,  while assuming the analytical side of the task yourself. This approach,  to be sure, is not for everyone, but it is certainly a worthy option.
Finally, scalpers should always keep the importance of consistency in  trade sizes while using their favored method. Using erratic trade sizes  while scalping is the safest way to ensure that you will have a  wiped-out account in no time, unless you stop practicing scalping before  the inevitable end. . Scalping is based on the principle that  profitable trades will cover the losses of failing ones in due time, but  if you pick position sizes randomly, the rules of probability dictate  that sooner or later an oversized, leveraged loss will crash all the  hard work of a whole day, if not longer. Thus, the scalper must make  sure that he pursues a predefined strategy with attention, patience and  consistent trade sizes. This is just the beginning, of course, but  without a good beginning we would diminish our odds of success, or at  least reduce our profit potential.
Now let’s take a look at the contents of this article where forex  scalping is discussed with all its details, advantages and  disadvantages. Our suggestion is that you peruse all of this article and  absorb all the information that can benefit you. But if you think that  you’re already familiar with some of the material, to shorten your  route, we present the table of contents of this article.
Contents
1. How scalpers make money:  Here we will take a look at the logic behind scalping, and we’ll  discuss the best conditions and necessary adjustments which must be made  by a scalper for profitable trading.
2. Choosing the right broker for scalping:  Not every broker is accommodative to scalping. Sometimes this is the  stated policy of the firm, at other times the broker creates the  conditions which make successful scalping impossible. It is important  that the novice scalper know what to look for in the broker before  opening his account, and here we’ll try to enlighten you on these  important points.
3. Best currencies for Scalping:  There are currency pairs where scalping is easy and lucrative, and  there are others where we advise strongly against the use of this  strategy. In this part we’ll discuss this important subject in detail  and give you usable hints for your trades.
4. Best times for Scalping:  There is an ongoing debate about the best times for successful scalping  in the forex market. We’ll present the various opinions, and then offer  our own conclusion.
5. Strategies in Scalping:  Strategies in scalping need not differ substantially from other  short-term methods. On the other hand, there are particular price  patterns and configurations where scalping is more profitable. We’ll  examine and study them in depth in this section.
a. Range Scalping: Some traders consider ranging markets better  suited for scalping strategies. Here we’ll examine why, and how to scalp  under such conditions.
b. Breakout Scalping: We’ll examine news breakouts, and technical  breakouts separately and discuss suitable scalping strategies for both.
c. Trend Scalping: Here we’ll take a general look at forex scalping in trending markets.
6. Trend Following while Scalping:  Trends are volatile, and many scalpers choose to trade them like a  trend follower, while minimizing the trade lifetime in order to control  market risk. In this part we’ll examine the usage of Fibonacci extension  levels for scalping trends.
7. Disadvantages and Criticism of Scalping:  Scalping is not for everyone, and even seasoned scalpers and those  committed to the style would do well to keep in mind some of the dangers  and disadvantages involved in using the style blindly.
8. Conclusions:  In this final section we’ll combine the lessons and discussions of the  previous chapters, and reach at conclusions about who should use the  forex scalping trading style, and the best conditions under which it can  be utilized.
 
 
 
Over the years, forex has acquired such a bad reputation that there  are books published sold with statements similar to the below:
"And you're surprised that we suggest gambling strategies for forex?  But don't be, there is no way of knowing if a currency will go up or  down, and the likelihood of guessing the next movement is as good as it  is with guessing a coin toss. But don't be alarmed: coin tosses and  similar gambling strategies have been perfected by experts for  generations. In this book you'll find all you need on how to profit from  trading forex with the only methods that work: betting strategies that  experts use to beat each other."
Though such innovative approaches to forex are bound to bring a smile  to our lips, and very short term movements in the forex market are  indeed very difficult to predict, solving the uncertainties associated  with the market with gambling methods is like throwing fuel on fire.  You're unlikely to make much from such a brave, but ultimately futile  effort.
Before looking at these strategies we must make an assumption that  the outcome of each movement at a chosen time period (say 1-minute,  5-minute, 30 seconds) is independent of the preceding or following  period. In other words, if there are three or four 5 minute periods (say  P1,P2,P3,P4) and in one of them(say, P2) the price is up, this result  has no bearing on the outcome of the other two 5 minute periods(P1,P3)  which follow and precede it. The opposite of this assumption, which  suggests that there’s memory in the trading process, that the outcomes  influence each other, would change the nature of our trading entirely.  If this were true,we could apply mathematical tools, such as the z-score  which we will discuss later, to maximize profits and minimize losses.
Let us look at a number of these strategies:
Martingale
This strategy was first developed in 18th century France, and has its  roots in the mathematical and scientific developments of the  enlightenment era.
The martingale strategy involves increasing bet sizes with every losing coin toss.  When the trader bets with amount x that a currency will go up at P1,  and his bet fails, he will simply double the amount to 2x, and repeat  his bet that the price will be up at P2. When the bet fails again, he  will double the amount to 4x, and bet the price will be up at P3, and  will go on with this until he wins what he wants, or he’s bankrupted as  he receives a margin call.
 | Period 
 | P1 
 | P2 
 | P3 
 | P4 
 | 
 | Outcome 
 | Down 
 | Down 
 | Up 
 | Down 
 | 
 | Amount bet 
 | 1 
 | 2 
 | 2 
 | 4 
 | 
 | Account Value 
 | 9 
 | 7 
 | 9 
 | 5 
 | 
 
Now the point of this trade is simple. Even if the trade was a  failure at P1, and a portion of original capital (amount x) was lost, a  win with twice the original capital would cover the original losses, and  register a profit. The same logic is valid at P3, P4, and so on.
In order to win, the martingale trader is making the assumption that  short term trade results (coin tosses) are not independent of each  other. That is, one coin toss, or one losing trade, is somehow  influencing the outcome of the next trade in line, and making it less  likely to be a loss as a result of mean regression.
Unfortunately for him, as we stated before, the outcome of coin  tosses or trades at each period is independent, and there can be any  large or small number of heads or tails (or a sequence of up P1, P2, P3,  P4, P5) without constituting an anomaly. We will come back to this  subject when discussing the gambler's fallacy.
Anti-Martingale
In the anti-martingale strategy, the trader does the opposite of what  the martingale player does, but still reaches at the same outcome,  because events are independent, and it's not possible to sustain a  winning streak infinitely.
So what does he do? Instead of doubling on losing trades, he doubles  on winning ones, and for instance, if he bets x at P1, and loses it at  P2, he keeps betting x at P2, until he makes a profit at P3, when he  doubles his bet to 2x, and goes on like that until the account is wiped  out.
<!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } -->
 | Period 
 | P1 
 | P2 
 | P3 
 | P4 
 | 
 | Outcome 
 | Down 
 | Down 
 | Up 
 | Down 
 | 
 | Amount Bet 
 | 1 
 | 1 
 | 2 
 | 2 
 | 
 | Account Value 
 | 9 
 | 8 
 | 9 
 | 7 
 | 
 
It's of course very simple to see the problem with this method. What  makes the trader double his risk on a winning trade at P3 if the result  of P3 signals nothing about the winning potential at P4? And we have  already made the statement that outcome at each period is independent of  everything else.
Gambler's Fallacy
Gambler’s fallacy is the unjustified expectation that outcomes that  constitute a rare series will regress to the mean in the future. Thus,  the gambler (for example, the martingale strategist) believes that a  streak of four losses at P1, P2, P3, and P4 implies a higher probability  of success at P5, because of the deviation of the series from the mean.  A simple example of this is the belief that four successive heads in a  series of 5 tosses will make the last outcome being a tail likelier.
In fact, the probability of heads or tails will remain just ½ at  every single toss if the coin tosser has an infinite amount of  opportunities of repeating the toss. If the number of tosses allowed is  limited however, the probability of getting a successful bet actually  diminishes with every successive failure.
Note that the opposite is also false: This is the belief that in a  random process (such as short-term fluctuations, or coin tosses)  developments that occur one after another influence the outcome of the  next to conform to the series, exemplified in the expectation that if a  coin toss returns a tail at P1, P2, P3, P4, the result at P5 will also  be a tail. Or, we can say using familiar terminology that in a micro  trend (on a thirty second, five minute, or one minute chart) an up  movement at P1, P2, P3 and so forth, will imply an up movement at P5.
The gambler’s fallacy is only valid in random processes where  there’s no relationship of causality within members of a series, or in  other words, successive outcomes are independent of each other.  So, as in our previous example, if the coins were somehow shaped to  increase the likelihood of tails at each successive throw (that is, if  the coin tosser were cheating), the gambler would be justified in  expecting tails eventually, and the outcomes would not be independent of  each other. How do we judge if the streaks of wins and losses generated  by our method are random or not (and independent of each other)? To  decide on that we use the z-score, and the interested may read the  related article on this website.
 
 
 
Money management is about the proper application of the points we  discussed: Capitalize the account sufficiently, do not overleverage, be  disciplined about profit taking, and avoiding losses. There's nothing  that difficult about doing this:. In general, decisiveness about one's  plans, and prudence about taking risks will grant the patient trader  success in a manner that might even be surprising for him. We must  remember that a successful trader (unless his success is the result of  extraordinary times and conditions) is not a flashy, exciting, boastful,  or prodigious being: in many cases he's just a cautious, patient,  modest, calm individual with good but not exceptional intelligence. His  success is not the result of some very esoteric knowledge, revolutionary  trading method, superhuman insight or intuition: but rather it's about  diligence, hard work, and humility.
In the previous three parts we discussed what you, as a trader,  should not do. In this section we'll take a brief look at the rules of  money management.
Taking profit, and stopping losses are the two concepts that form the  core a successful money management strategy; do not let greed erase  your profits, and do not let pride prevent you from exiting a position  that is proven to be wrong.
Entering a stop-loss or take-profit order is rather simple since in  almost every trading software the program will prompt you to enter these  orders as soon as you make a trade. In general, unless a trader has a  clear schedule for the duration of his position based on fundamental  analysis, a take-profit order is a must. A stop-loss order is almost  always a must however, regardless of the basis of your analysis. Of  course, the stop can be wide and tight at the discretion of the trader,  and if there are good reasons behind the position you take in the first  place, persistence against market swings can be appropriate and  rewarding. The key point that distinguishes foolish persistence from  logical resilience is that the fool persists because he's afraid of  realizing losses, while the successful trader keeps to his position  based on his analytical skills which were acquired after the realization  of countless stop-loss orders during the learning process.
As with everything else, the trader must base his stop-losses, and  take-profit orders on reason and logic, not on any kind of intuition,  sixth sense, or emotional matter. The nature of forex is such that, due  to constant volatility, even a well-conceived, and well-thought position  will at some stage have to be in the red. Provided that we don't revise  our initial purposes and schedules based on fear or euphoria, there's  nothing wrong about that, and the trade should always be allowed to run  its course, if the causes that led to our decision remain intact. If  they are gone, the trade should be discarded too. But if the reasons are  still valid, we shouldn't be afraid of unrealized losses: we placed the  stop-loss order at where it is only to allow the position to run its  course.
We mentioned before that regardless of our political or social  persuasion, we must choose to be boring and conservative to achieve  success in trading. Successful money management always aims at the  preservation of capital, not necessarily great profits. We already  detailed many of the reasons for that conviction, but another reason for  our conservatism in taking risks is provided by the fact that it's a  lot timelier and costlier to repair a mistake in comparison to the time  it takes to commit it.
To give a very simple example: supposing that through reckless errors  we lose about half of our account while trading, what would be the  profit ratio we'd need to repair the mistake and get back to our  beginning capital? Say we begin at 100 USD, lose ½ of it, and end up  with 50 USD. We'll need to double our account just to get our losses  back. In other words, for a fifty percent loss, we need a hundred  percent profit, just to mend the damage caused by recklessness. With  such facts standing against cavalier behavior in the markets, how can we  avoid being conservative in trading?
Here are a number of time-tested methods the trader can employ in  order to minimize his losses, and to achieve a moderately successful  long-term career.
-  Do not take a trade if you can't back it with very convincing  reasons. Your capital is precious, and it's limited. Opportunities in  the forex market are limitless, and there's always another chance, if  you (and your capital) are there to take it.
 
-  Do not trade on others' opinions, unless you understand and agree  with them. We emphasized repeatedly that understanding what we do is the  only way to gain confidence in our actions and minimizing the role of  emotions, and we won't learn anything without understanding what we're  doing.
 
-  Do not change your stop-loss, or take-profit points once you enter  them. If the reasons behind the trade are gone, discard it. If they  remain, let the trade run its course. Sit back, and forget about it.  Concentrate on your education. Remember, panicking will not gain you a  dime, and however long you stress about your success or failure, the  market will do what it wants: you cannot influence its decisions. Stress  will ruin your nerves and wreck your career, but won't better your  chances of success, and will not save you from realizing losses on an  erroneous position.
 
-  Do not expect your stop-loss order to absolve you from faulty  analysis. The stop-loss order is not a safety valve to care for the  mistakes of a lazy analyst, it's only a mechanism for recognizing that  your analysis was wrong. Thus, if there's no good reason for the trade  in the first place, the stop-loss order will be completely useless,  regardless of how tight or wide it is..
 
-  Do not be enthusiastic, do not be fearful. Neither will help you.  Forex is not a game, it's a business, and you have the responsibility  for your choices. There's nothing magical about it.
 
-  Do not hurry to take profits, and tarry in liquidating an outdated  position which the events have proven to be erroneous. Taking profits  and stopping losses should both occur when the events provide the  reasons for doing so, or the price action forces you to make choices.
 
-  Do not use high leverage and tight stops together, as that is the  fastest path to a wiped out account. Instead employ low leverage to  control your risk, and use stop-loss orders to manage volatility and  price swings. To repeat, use low leverage to ensure that when you make a  faulty analysis, the results are tolerable; and use wider stops to  ensure that the position can absorb random price swings.
 
-  Do not average down, do not add funds to a losing position. If you  have confidence that the position in red will eventually turn black, let  it run its course, but do not ever add to it. Let time show you if your  analysis was right or wrong, but do not attempt to fight the market by  haughtily increasing the size of your losing position in order to  average down the starting the price. Do not increase your risk while  you're in the red.
 
-  Scale in. You can use multiple entry orders on top of each other as  the trend moves in the direction you anticipate. As your first order  makes a decent profit, set its stop-loss order at the entry price, enter  a second order in the same direction, and repeat as long as the trade  is successful.
 
-  Do not gamble. Do not use casino strategies in a financial business.
 
 
 
 
Thanks to the Internet and the relatively recent availability of  online forex brokers, just about anyone with a computer and an Internet  connection can open a demo forex account and trade forex with virtual  money.
This feature allows newcomers to forex trading to get a better idea  about what trading forex involves and also helps them improve their  education about the huge largely-unregulated forex market.
Demo Trading Results Can Differ
Nevertheless, new traders need to be aware that the results they  might achieve when trading in a forex demo trading account may be quite  different from the results seen in a live forex trading account.
Even if a person performs extremely well trading a demo account,  their results in a live account often differ considerably. In general,  this phenomenon tends to arise because when your own funds are at risk, a  different trading mindset often ensues than when trading with virtual  money.
This key distinction tends to affect traders in different ways, depending on their psychological makeup.
Other Reasons Why Demo Trading Gives Different Results
Not only does the difference in a demo trading environment involve  the psychological aspect, but the general market environment can also  differ substantially.
Although a price is easily guaranteed by a broker for a demo trade  when no funds change hands, getting that price for a live trade may be  an entirely different matter when trading a live account. This can be  especially true during a volatile or fast market when slippage often  occurs in the execution of orders.
In addition, because of the lack of financial commitment, traders  tend to overtrade and deviate from their set trading plans when trading  demo accounts.
If you really want optimal results trading a live account, then it  would be wise to trade in the demo account as closely and in the amounts  that you will most likely trade once you fund an account.
Alternatively, you can just trade small amounts using a micro account  to get a feel for a live trading environment before moving up to a  standard account and dealing sizes.
Demo Trading Benefits
Trading virtual money removes the psychological element from trading,  so for this reason, it cannot accurately assess a person's trading  abilities. Nevertheless, virtual trading can have great benefits when  testing the performance of a trade plan and also for trader education  purposes.
When used as an educational tool, a forex demo account  gives novices a risk-free start to trading in the forex market. In  addition, strategies can be put to the test without assuming any risk,  all in real time trading situations.
Also, live trading involves inherent risks that can affect the trader  emotionally, while trading in a demo account tends to limit a person's  emotional involvement in trading. In addition, considerably larger  positions can usually be taken in a demo account that may lead to what  seems like higher profitability, when in fact, the risk-adjusted returns  are actually quite low.
Overall, trading in a demo account offers a great service to novices  that would otherwise have to learn using, and probably losing, real  money. While the emotional rush of risking real money while trading may  be lacking in demo trading, trading a demo account allows you to learn  to watch the market closely and can help you get a better feel for how  the forex market operates without putting any real cash on the line.
 
 
 
Day Trading can offer a very exciting and lucrative way of trading the  forex market for those who take the time to prepare appropriately for  the endeavor. As the name implies, the basic idea behind day trading is  that all transactions happen during the trader's normal business hours.  Also, all day-trading positions are typically closed out before the end  of the business day. 
Advantages and Disadvantages of Day Trading
Day trading has the primary advantage that at the end of the day, the  trader goes home with no positions and no overnight market risk.  Another advantage of day trading is that the trader tends to be alert  and can more easily focus on and take advantage of intra-day market  movements.
Nevertheless, people with heart conditions or those overly-sensitive  to stress may want to trade other strategies that are not as intensive  and short-term in nature. Also, since the big moves in foreign exchange  generally happen when the market trends over weeks or even months, day  trading strategies may not give you the same sort of returns as  successful trend-following trading systems.
Developing a Day Trading Strategy
If you think you might like to try your hand at day trading, the  first thing you will need to do is come up with a successful day trading  system. You can start this process by reviewing literature and online  resources for information that can help you develop an objective trade  plan.
The main idea behind having an objective trading plan involves  minimizing any emotional interference that might sabotage your forex  trading. Also remember to keep your trading system relatively simple and  easy to follow so that you can do so quickly and with confidence.
One especially important consideration with day trading strategies is  the risk/reward ratio of the strategy employed. For example, a day  trader might set a goal of 30 pips of profit per day with a risk level  of 20 pips to begin with. As their trading success improves and the  equity in their trading account rises, they can also increase the  amounts traded.
Many commercial automated trading robots risk hundreds of pips to  make just a few and so they seem to trade well for a while before  eventually blowing up on a serious adverse move. You will want to make  sure that your day trading system avoids this potential pitfall and uses  a risk/reward ratio that is conducive to long-term success.
Testing Your Day Trading System
The next step is to test your trading plan. Many day traders opt to  first test their day trading strategy over historical data to find a  system that has suitable profitability and draw down characteristics  that suit their trading goals.
Then, they will want to trade their system on live data to gain  experience and confidence in putting the strategy into practice. This  process can also suggest refinements to the day trading strategy that  can make it more successful.
Using a Forex Broker for Day Trading
Once an aspiring forex day trader has developed a day trading  strategy and practiced implementing it, they can usually open up a free  forex demo account with a forex broker without risking any money initially.
Doing so can give a trader a good idea of whether the actual work and  returns involved in day trading in the forex market might be suitable  for them. You can then usually upgrade and fund your account when you  feel confident in your ability to day trade profitably on a consistent  basis.
 
 
 
 Fundamental analysis examines the reasons behind the price action.  The analyst uses economic indicators and news flows to decide on the  causes behind price movements. Since one cannot determine the cause of  something which has not yet happened, the causal relationships  demonstrated by fundamental analysis are always about present market  behavior. Nonetheless, economic events move slower than market  developments, and this is the real cause of the great predictive and  interpretative power of fundamental analysis. 
Technical analysis is a relatively new phenomenon. It has been  developed mostly in the last century, for the most part by US-based  traders, for providing some clarity to short term price actions.  Fundamental analysis, on the other hand, has been with us for many  centuries. The ancient speculator of the Peloponnesian War in Classical  Greece used news flow (hearsay, public meetings) and economic data on  supply and demand (starvation, poor harvest) for stockpiling resources  and for deciding when to sell them. The ancient Chinese classic Shiji,  which records the lives and exploits of important personages two  millennia before our time, reports on successful traders and speculators  who traded wartime shortages, or the needs of warlords for massive  profits. Some of these people were middlemen who exploited the  inefficiencies of ancient markets, others were producers themselves with  good insight into macro-scale developments, and patience allowed them  to successfully utilize their analytical capabilities. But all of them  used news and analysis to profit from fundamental developments, without  any tool other than common sense to help them.
During the Middle Ages there were the Fugger and the Medici families  who took advantage of their good relationships with royalty and  governments to stay one step ahead of the markets. The Rotschild family  of the 18th-19th centuries also used fundamental imbalances created by  warfare to undertake contracts with sovereigns states and for maximizing  profits. The twentieth century, of course, has had more than its fair  share of traders and speculators capitalizing on market distortions,  imbalances and bubbles for very large profits. But at the basic level,  the tools of the successful investor, trader or speculator are the  same: a good understanding of fundamental data, deaf ears to hyperbole,  euphoria and panic, and the strength of will to act when the time is  right.
Human life and natural phenomena move on causal relationships.  Causality is a major principle of scientific study. And, given how our  brains function, it is not possible to make any meaningful decision,  judgment or choice without backing it with sensible causes. This is also  where the power of fundamental analysis originates. The charts of the  technical analyst may give all kinds of profit alerts, signals and  alarms, but there’s little in the charts that tell us why a group of  people make the choices that create the price patterns. Ultimately, most  transactions in the financial markets have reasons that are independent  of technical values in the long-term. If a stock goes down in response  to a temporary bout of panic among traders, the price will rebound once  the dust settles; or, if a currency pair plummets in value because of a  false rumor or a temporary squeeze of capital, the situation will  inevitably be corrected once a stream of concrete data establishes the  false nature of the fears.
Fundamental analysis allows us to decide on the value of an asset. We  are unable to be certain about the future value of an asset, and past  value is never a good indicator for future prices. But, by all means, we  posses the faculties and resources necessary for deciding if the price  of an asset is expensive or not, and that is the basis on which the  fundamental analyst bases his choices. We can establish the causes  behind a trend, we can establish if they are ongoing, and we can exploit  that knowledge to bring us profits.
There are many traders who successfully used fundamental analysis to  obtain great wealth, but the exploits of George Soros, and his Quantum  Hedge Fund have made them household names in our era, particularly after  the notorious Black Wednesday on which Britain was forced to drop out  of the European exchange rate mechanism. In the rest of this article  we will examine this interesting event to drive home the great power of  fundamental analysis and how accurate and profitable its predictions can  be.
Most traders today know that the British pound is not a part of the  Eurosystem. It is an independent currency managed by its own central  bank. While some may attribute this fact to the insular mentality of the  British and their typical desire for independence from continental  customs and habits, this is not the real cause of the existence of the  pound today. The real reasons are to be found in the developments of  September 16th 1992, and the events leading up to them.
Before it was launched, the nations which today share the Euro as  their national currency had to abide by an agreement known as the  European Exchange rate mechanism (ERM) which was the precursor to the  eventual unification of currencies. The ERM stipulated a fixed currency  exchange rate between each national currency and the ECU (the European  currency unit, which would eventually be called the Euro), but bilateral  currency values were allowed to float within a margin of 2.25 of the  the fixed rate. The ERM was created in 1979, and Britain was one of the  later members of the EU to join the mechanism in 1990.
At the time Britain joined, the government of Margaret Thatcher was  lost in intrigues and disputes about the benefits and the need for ERM.  With inflation at 15 percent, to restrain the expansionism of the  previous era, the British government had for a while been mirroring the  Bundesbank’s policy rates. The decision to join was partly taken to  formalize this policy of copying the central bank rates of Western  Germany, and also as a result of an argument between the chancellor of  the exchequer (the equivalent of the Treasury secretary), Nigel  Lawson and the prime minister’s economic advisor, which resulted in the  resignation of Lawson. He was replaced by the future prime minister John  Major, who in turn finalized the entry of Britain into the ERM in 1990  at a rate of 2.95DM to the pound, with commitment to intervene at 2.778.
As we just mentioned, at the time of Britain’s entry inflation was  quite high, due to the expansionist policies of Nigel Lawson. The easy  money policy had created a period of boom at the end of the 80’s, but it  had also created a property bubble and high inflation which had to be  restrained by higher interest rates and a period of economic downturn.  Thus, when the crisis struck two years after UK’s adoption of the ERM,  economic conditions were already far from being ideal. Unfortunately for  the British, this was also a time when German interest rates were even  higher than the British rates, as the Bundesbank tried to control the  inflationary impact of reunification-related spending.
Mr. Soros, who enters the scene at about this point, had established  his Quantum Fund in the early 1970s in partnership with the equally  famous Jim Rogers, his initial capital being provided by a number of  wealthy acquaintances including the aforementioned Rotschild family.  Before his rise to notoriety through his role in the British debacle, he  had already made massive profits in trading the collapse of currency  pegs and economic deregulation of the 70s. He and his analysts had  impressive skills in analyzing the fundamental factors that drive the  international economy. Indeed, apart from being a rich financier, Mr.  Soros has books published on philosophy and politics, and he is equally  well-known as a philanthropist and for his contributions to liberal  movements around the world.
Upon analyzing the fundamental situation of the British economy and  the increasing gap between the performance of the British and German  economies at the time of Britain’s adoption of the ERM, Mr. Soros was  increasingly convinced that the British would drop out of the system  regardless of the choices they made. The fundamental health of the UK  economy was incapable of coping with the demands of matching Germany at  the time. Thus, he began shorting the pound as early as spring 1992, in  anticipation that high interest rates would eventually deepen the  recession in the UK economy, and the resulting fall of asset prices  would prove unpalatable to the government authorities. It is thought  that he accumulated short positions reaching 6.5 billion pounds (about  10 billion USD), at a leverage of 1:10.
Meanwhile, the situation of Britain continued to deteriorate as the  USD kept depreciating, making British exports less competitive on a  global basis. The breaking point came, as it often happens, through  political turmoil. When in spring 1992 the Danes refused to join the  ERM, and it was decided that France would have a referendum on the issue  as well, the resulting nervous atmosphere reached climax in a general  distrust of the currency pegs of nations that were suffering the worst  of the ERM.
On Wednesday, 16th September 1992, as speculators kept selling the  pound, the British cabinet held meeting after meeting on how to defend  the nation’s currency. They first raised the main rate to 10, then to  12, eventually promised to raise to 15 percent in order to convince the  speculators that they were facing the full determination and might of  the UK government. The government also bought billions of pounds to prop  up the currency, but all that was in vain. Heedless monetary  expansionism of the Lawson Boom had created massive imbalances in the  British financial system, and the British economy would never be able to  function under such a high interest rate burden. Speculators like  George Soros had already made their calculations and had discovered the  untenable nature of the British peg a long time ago through fundamental  analysis, and they would not be cowed into submission by the frantic,  but ultimately futile endeavors of the John Major Government.
By 19:00 it was already clear that the peg couldn’t be defended, and  the Chancellor of the Exchequer had to declare that the government would  leave the ERM framework, and the main interest rate would remain at 12  percent. The credibility of the British government was destroyed in a  few hours, the speculators left for new hunts, and George Soros pocketed  an estimated 1 billion USD in the process. As the person who took the  largest bet, he was instantly notorious across the globe, and to this  day he’s known as "the man who broke the Bank of England".
Later, it was also admitted that the 15 percent promise was just a  ruse created to calm the markets, and as many speculators believed, the  government had no intention of holding the rates at such a high level  given the difficulties the British economy were going through.
It is an exciting story, but the sensational value of the events has  no use for our trading practices. What are the lessons that we gain from  this disaster for the UK economy?
 Fundamental analysis examines the reasons behind the price action.  The analyst uses economic indicators and news flows to decide on the  causes behind price movements. Since one cannot determine the cause of  something which has not yet happened, the causal relationships  demonstrated by fundamental analysis are always about present market  behavior. Nonetheless, economic events move slower than market  developments, and this is the real cause of the great predictive and  interpretative power of fundamental analysis. 
Technical analysis is a relatively new phenomenon. It has been  developed mostly in the last century, for the most part by US-based  traders, for providing some clarity to short term price actions.  Fundamental analysis, on the other hand, has been with us for many  centuries. The ancient speculator of the Peloponnesian War in Classical  Greece used news flow (hearsay, public meetings) and economic data on  supply and demand (starvation, poor harvest) for stockpiling resources  and for deciding when to sell them. The ancient Chinese classic Shiji,  which records the lives and exploits of important personages two  millennia before our time, reports on successful traders and speculators  who traded wartime shortages, or the needs of warlords for massive  profits. Some of these people were middlemen who exploited the  inefficiencies of ancient markets, others were producers themselves with  good insight into macro-scale developments, and patience allowed them  to successfully utilize their analytical capabilities. But all of them  used news and analysis to profit from fundamental developments, without  any tool other than common sense to help them.
During the Middle Ages there were the Fugger and the Medici families  who took advantage of their good relationships with royalty and  governments to stay one step ahead of the markets. The Rotschild family  of the 18th-19th centuries also used fundamental imbalances created by  warfare to undertake contracts with sovereigns states and for maximizing  profits. The twentieth century, of course, has had more than its fair  share of traders and speculators capitalizing on market distortions,  imbalances and bubbles for very large profits. But at the basic level,  the tools of the successful investor, trader or speculator are the  same: a good understanding of fundamental data, deaf ears to hyperbole,  euphoria and panic, and the strength of will to act when the time is  right.
Human life and natural phenomena move on causal relationships.  Causality is a major principle of scientific study. And, given how our  brains function, it is not possible to make any meaningful decision,  judgment or choice without backing it with sensible causes. This is also  where the power of fundamental analysis originates. The charts of the  technical analyst may give all kinds of profit alerts, signals and  alarms, but there’s little in the charts that tell us why a group of  people make the choices that create the price patterns. Ultimately, most  transactions in the financial markets have reasons that are independent  of technical values in the long-term. If a stock goes down in response  to a temporary bout of panic among traders, the price will rebound once  the dust settles; or, if a currency pair plummets in value because of a  false rumor or a temporary squeeze of capital, the situation will  inevitably be corrected once a stream of concrete data establishes the  false nature of the fears.
Fundamental analysis allows us to decide on the value of an asset. We  are unable to be certain about the future value of an asset, and past  value is never a good indicator for future prices. But, by all means, we  posses the faculties and resources necessary for deciding if the price  of an asset is expensive or not, and that is the basis on which the  fundamental analyst bases his choices. We can establish the causes  behind a trend, we can establish if they are ongoing, and we can exploit  that knowledge to bring us profits.
There are many traders who successfully used fundamental analysis to  obtain great wealth, but the exploits of George Soros, and his Quantum  Hedge Fund have made them household names in our era, particularly after  the notorious Black Wednesday on which Britain was forced to drop out  of the European exchange rate mechanism. In the rest of this article  we will examine this interesting event to drive home the great power of  fundamental analysis and how accurate and profitable its predictions can  be.
Most traders today know that the British pound is not a part of the  Eurosystem. It is an independent currency managed by its own central  bank. While some may attribute this fact to the insular mentality of the  British and their typical desire for independence from continental  customs and habits, this is not the real cause of the existence of the  pound today. The real reasons are to be found in the developments of  September 16th 1992, and the events leading up to them.
Before it was launched, the nations which today share the Euro as  their national currency had to abide by an agreement known as the  European Exchange rate mechanism (ERM) which was the precursor to the  eventual unification of currencies. The ERM stipulated a fixed currency  exchange rate between each national currency and the ECU (the European  currency unit, which would eventually be called the Euro), but bilateral  currency values were allowed to float within a margin of 2.25 of the  the fixed rate. The ERM was created in 1979, and Britain was one of the  later members of the EU to join the mechanism in 1990.
At the time Britain joined, the government of Margaret Thatcher was  lost in intrigues and disputes about the benefits and the need for ERM.  With inflation at 15 percent, to restrain the expansionism of the  previous era, the British government had for a while been mirroring the  Bundesbank’s policy rates. The decision to join was partly taken to  formalize this policy of copying the central bank rates of Western  Germany, and also as a result of an argument between the chancellor of  the exchequer (the equivalent of the Treasury secretary), Nigel  Lawson and the prime minister’s economic advisor, which resulted in the  resignation of Lawson. He was replaced by the future prime minister John  Major, who in turn finalized the entry of Britain into the ERM in 1990  at a rate of 2.95DM to the pound, with commitment to intervene at 2.778.
As we just mentioned, at the time of Britain’s entry inflation was  quite high, due to the expansionist policies of Nigel Lawson. The easy  money policy had created a period of boom at the end of the 80’s, but it  had also created a property bubble and high inflation which had to be  restrained by higher interest rates and a period of economic downturn.  Thus, when the crisis struck two years after UK’s adoption of the ERM,  economic conditions were already far from being ideal. Unfortunately for  the British, this was also a time when German interest rates were even  higher than the British rates, as the Bundesbank tried to control the  inflationary impact of reunification-related spending.
Mr. Soros, who enters the scene at about this point, had established  his Quantum Fund in the early 1970s in partnership with the equally  famous Jim Rogers, his initial capital being provided by a number of  wealthy acquaintances including the aforementioned Rotschild family.  Before his rise to notoriety through his role in the British debacle, he  had already made massive profits in trading the collapse of currency  pegs and economic deregulation of the 70s. He and his analysts had  impressive skills in analyzing the fundamental factors that drive the  international economy. Indeed, apart from being a rich financier, Mr.  Soros has books published on philosophy and politics, and he is equally  well-known as a philanthropist and for his contributions to liberal  movements around the world.
Upon analyzing the fundamental situation of the British economy and  the increasing gap between the performance of the British and German  economies at the time of Britain’s adoption of the ERM, Mr. Soros was  increasingly convinced that the British would drop out of the system  regardless of the choices they made. The fundamental health of the UK  economy was incapable of coping with the demands of matching Germany at  the time. Thus, he began shorting the pound as early as spring 1992, in  anticipation that high interest rates would eventually deepen the  recession in the UK economy, and the resulting fall of asset prices  would prove unpalatable to the government authorities. It is thought  that he accumulated short positions reaching 6.5 billion pounds (about  10 billion USD), at a leverage of 1:10.
Meanwhile, the situation of Britain continued to deteriorate as the  USD kept depreciating, making British exports less competitive on a  global basis. The breaking point came, as it often happens, through  political turmoil. When in spring 1992 the Danes refused to join the  ERM, and it was decided that France would have a referendum on the issue  as well, the resulting nervous atmosphere reached climax in a general  distrust of the currency pegs of nations that were suffering the worst  of the ERM.
On Wednesday, 16th September 1992, as speculators kept selling the  pound, the British cabinet held meeting after meeting on how to defend  the nation’s currency. They first raised the main rate to 10, then to  12, eventually promised to raise to 15 percent in order to convince the  speculators that they were facing the full determination and might of  the UK government. The government also bought billions of pounds to prop  up the currency, but all that was in vain. Heedless monetary  expansionism of the Lawson Boom had created massive imbalances in the  British financial system, and the British economy would never be able to  function under such a high interest rate burden. Speculators like  George Soros had already made their calculations and had discovered the  untenable nature of the British peg a long time ago through fundamental  analysis, and they would not be cowed into submission by the frantic,  but ultimately futile endeavors of the John Major Government.
By 19:00 it was already clear that the peg couldn’t be defended, and  the Chancellor of the Exchequer had to declare that the government would  leave the ERM framework, and the main interest rate would remain at 12  percent. The credibility of the British government was destroyed in a  few hours, the speculators left for new hunts, and George Soros pocketed  an estimated 1 billion USD in the process. As the person who took the  largest bet, he was instantly notorious across the globe, and to this  day he’s known as "the man who broke the Bank of England".
Later, it was also admitted that the 15 percent promise was just a  ruse created to calm the markets, and as many speculators believed, the  government had no intention of holding the rates at such a high level  given the difficulties the British economy were going through.
It is an exciting story, but the sensational value of the events has  no use for our trading practices. What are the lessons that we gain from  this disaster for the UK economy?
- Fundamental analysis is always right. Imbalances will always be  corrected. But it takes time and patience to exploit them successfully.  Mr. Soros held his position for months before market developments  confirmed his expectations. 
- Neither government authorities, nor company heads are immune to the  temptation of lying, or “bluffing” as it’s sometimes called. If you’re a  speculator, nobody will have any sympathy for you if you lose money,  and the only person you can blame is yourself. So be careful about your  leverage, your risk and who you believe. 
- Macroeconomic events are often triggered by political developments.  Political events rarely cause major economic shocks by themselves alone,  but accumulated imbalances are usually balanced as a result of  political shocks. 
- The payback time of expansion fueled by monetary expansionism is  exceptionally destructive in any economy. If the economic leadership of a  nation is constrained by political obstacles when the payback time  arrives, the results are doubly disastrous. 
If you intend to use fundamental analysis in the way George Soros  used it, you will need a good understanding of both politics and  economics. Achieving such a skill is not that hard, provided you have  the commitment and the patience to complete your task. 
 
 
Technical strategies aim to predict future prices on the basis of  past developments. All that the technical analyst is interested in is  the price, and news, or data have no bearing on his decisions. In this  article we will examine some of the basic concepts behind technical  strategies, and will attempt to summarize the main tools used by  technical traders in braking down price patterns.
As we noted technical analysis chooses to ignore everything except  the price in its decisions. A technical strategy will usually involve  several phases, each clarifying some aspect of the price action, until a  credible entry or exit point is determined. The phases for this are.
1. Identify the type of the market and the type of the trade..
Needless to say, the first step in technical analysis must be the  identification of the market with which the trader is interacting. After  that he must determine the time period of the trade he will enter. What  kind of charts will the trader use for his trade? Will it be a monthly  trade, or an hourly one? If it’s a monthly trade, there’s no need to  worry about the hourly changes in the price, provided that the strategy  regards the present  value as an acceptable monthly entry or exit point.  Conversely, if the trade is for the short term, the trader may desire  to examine charts of longer periods to gain an understanding of the  bigger picture which may guide him with respect to his stop loss or take  profit orders.
The trader will use trend lines, oscillators, and visual  identification to determine the type of market that the price action is  presenting. Strategies in a flat, ranging, or trending market are bound  to contrast strongly with each other, and it is not possible to identify  a useful strategy without first filtering the tools on the basis of the  market’s character. Once this is done, and the time frame of the trade  is determined, the second stage is -
2. Picking the technical tools
On the basis of the criteria discussed in the previous item, we must  pick the appropriate technical tools for the chart we examine. If the  market is trending, there’s little point to using the RSI. If it’s  ranging, the moving averages are unlikely to be of much use. If the  underlying currency pair is strongly cyclical (for example, if the  currency is issued by a commodity exporting nation) the commodity  channel index could be a good choice. If it is highly volatile,  smoothing out the fluctuations with moving average crossovers could be  very beneficial for identifying the trend.
Of course the list can be extended. The trader must refine his  approach to trade over time by deciding on the kind of indicators which  he understands best, and then combining them later to form a simple and  concise method.
3. Refine the periods, and other inputs
Upon deciding on the technical tools, the analyst must decide on the  periods, and ranges for which values must be supplied to the software.  Today’s traders have many advantages over those in the past, but  diligence and patience may not be one of those. As we’re so used to  having everything automated and performed by the computer with no  questions asked, many don’t even bother to tinker with the minutiae that  can in fact be all the difference between success and failure for the  trader’s analysis.
Thus, before going any further, the trader must check which periods,  which values provide the pattern that is most fitting for the price  action on the chart. For example, for the RSI, will we pick a period of  14, 10, or 7 for the chart we examine? Or what will be the periods of  the moving averages that constitute the MACD indicator? These can only  be answered through trial and error, and for each price pattern, a  different value may be necessary.
4. Seek the signals
Once the technical tools are setup, we must now seek the signals that  will show us the trade opportunities created by investor sentiment and  temporary imbalances in the supply and demand for a currency pair. The  signals that we seek are the ones created by the interaction between a  number of indicators, such as that between moving averages, various  oscillators, or between the price and the indicator. Our purpose is to  confirm our ideas with various aspects of technical analysis. If there’s  an oversold or overbough level, we will confirm it with a  divergence/convergence. If there’s a breakout, we will seek to ascertain  it with studies of crossovers.
We will examine the signals in greater detail a bit later, but in  summary they are channels, crossovers, divergence or convergences,   breakouts, consolidation patterns, the various price patterns like  triangles, flags, and head and shoulders. We will keep our indicators  simple, but we will make sure that the signals generated by them are  examined and exploited to the full, allowing us to draw a complete  picture of the price action.
5. Perform the analysis
After deciding on the signals and their meaning, we will perform our  analysis by identifying actionable signals, and deciding on capital  allocation in light of proper money management techniques. When  analyzing the data we must make our utmost exertion to ensure that we  focus on signals relevant to our selected period and trading plan. This  stage of analysis will involve the separation of wheat from chaff, and  data from noise.
6. Compare the results, execute the trade
After examining the various scenarios presented by the charts, and  determining on which of them are actionable, the trader will compare  them in terms of credibility and profit potential (for example, how  extreme are the indicator values, how much profit or loss will be  generated in case a take- profit or stop-loss order is realized?) Once  that is done, he will pick the trade that offers the highest returns  with the lowest risk on the basis of the technical scenario that is the  most contrarian.
What the above implies is that, when a trend follower trades, he will  wait for the corrections, acting on a contrarian basis to the short  term movement, while conforming to the main trend. When he desires to  bet against the trend, he will await the most extreme valuations  generated by the trend, and when the momentum is highest, he will make a  contrarian bet at the first credible reversal.
/////////////////////////
A forex trading strategy is created by using many different types of  price phenomena that are manifested on many different kinds of  indicators. We will examine strategies later, but at this stage let us  examine the signal types that are used to create them.
1. Channels
Channels are two parallel trend lines that constrain the price action  in opposite directions. The upper line prevents bullish breakouts,  while the lower line checks the bearish ones. A channel is a very  regular formation, and offers great potential for realizing a profitable  trade, but it’s also relatively rare.
Channels are used to generate signals that help us identify breakout  points. If the indicator used to analyze the channel stayed above or  below a certain level for a long period of time, a breakout can be  confirmed by excessive values. But given how regular and controlled the  price movement must be while inside a channel, the trader can devise  many other ways of trading it, and some of his methods can be based on  fundamental analysis too.
The existence of a channel will allow the trader to use other tools,  such as overbought, oversold indicators, to generate additional signals.  A channel also signals that market participants are expecting a major  development to decide the direction of the trend, and that the trader  must be alert about potential     
2. Crossovers
Crossovers occur when one indicator’s value suddenly rises or falls  below that of another one which is used as a signal line. Crossovers  signal momentum change in the market, and are often used to generate  trade signals that are more reliable than those indicated by single  indicators.
In the hourly chart of AUD/USD we see the 14-day moving average shown  by the yellow line falling below the 100-                     day  moving average shown by red, and we notice that the price later made a  major move in the same direction.  Crossovers are not limited to one  type of indicator, and of course, the trader can use them in many  different situations for analyzing price patterns.
The disadvantage with crossovers is born of the fact that they’re  fairly common, and thus prone to generate conflicting and false signals.  Unless confirmed by other, more reliable phenomena like  divergence/convergence, the trader should be cautious about regarding  the crossover as an actionable signal.    
3. Breakthroughs, breakouts
This signal is generated when a range or a consolidation pattern  breaks down, allowing the price to move violently and rapidly in the  direction of the breakout. Potential breakouts are identified first by  direct visual examination (for instance, an uptrend is fluctuating  around a price level for a prolonged period ), and then confirmed by the  behavior of indicators (a very calm MACD registering strong values, or  an moving average crossover).
A consolidation occurs when a trend fluctuates around a value for a  relatively long period without jeopardizing its strength. A breakout is  when a range pattern breaks down, and the price action is no longer  constrained. A breakthrough is the situation where a previously strong  resistance level is breached by an ongoing trend.
Consolidation, breakout and breakthrough may all occur on the price  chart, or on the indicators themselves. The interpretation will differ  depending on the significance of the levels breached (for example, the  price breaking through a multi-year resistance line is more important  than the RSI reaching a previously unbreached level.)
False breakouts are relatively common in the markets, and many  traders try to avoid them by getting into the trade when the breakout is  going through its correction phase. Deciding on the nature of a  breakout will of course depend on probability analysis. Experience, and  proper money management methods are our best friends.
4. Divergence/convergence
The tendency of all indicators to create false signals is well-known  among technical traders, and to overcome this problem, traders have been  looking at divergences between indicators, or between an indicator and  the price for quite some time. Convergence occurs when successive values  of two indicators are closer to each other with the passage of time.  Divergence occurs when the values are farther apart as time passes. In  both cases, the principle behind convergence/divergence dictates that  the indicators make movements in opposing directions, and the phenomenon  is used to signal that the ongoing trend is getting weaker.
In the above example of AUD/USD, we see that the MACD is making lower  values even as the price keeps getting higher. In other words, the  price action is not only comfirmed, but contradicted by the indicator.  Traders seek these signals to decide on opportunities that offer a  greater risk-reward potential.  
5. Price patterns
Price patterns, such as triangles, head and shoulders, pennants,  flags can all be used to identify a potential trade, or at least be used  to signify an emerging opportunity. These patterns all have different  ways of being interpreted, but the seasoned analyst is unlikely to move  on any of them without receiving a confirmation from a secondary source,  such as an indicator. We will examine the patterns in detail later.
Conclusion
Technical strategies are created by the combination of the above  signals and patterns. It is a good idea to combine signals of indicators  with price patterns to receive more reliable indications on a potential  trade. For example, an MACD crossover after a major counter-trend move  can be much more reliable as a trade signal than any value of the MACD,  however extreme it may be. In a major triangle movement, a divergence or  convergence between the RSI and the price can be far more reliable than  the extremes registered on the indicator.
In short, instead of absolute values, the technical analyst will  choose to focus on the rarer phenomena which we just discussed. In  following chapters of this section, we will discuss technical strategies  in greater detail.
 
 
 
Trend following is perhaps the most popular long-term strategy in all  financial markets. It is exceedingly effective and profitable when the  conditions are favorable, is quite straightforward in its methodology,  and there are many individuals, past and present, famous or obscure, who  have used this strategy to success and riches. We should note that the  technical aspect of trend following is in fact quite simple, but also  that it requires, before everything else, discipline, sound money  management, and patience from the trader. Trend following is not a short-term method, and patience and determination are as important as correct analysis as a result.
Trends are created by powerful underlying economic factors which may  not be all that clear to those who are not very familiar with  fundamental analysis. But the simple patterns created by the price  action in response to the economic events can often be identified  through methods that are easy to learn and apply. Thus, the retail  trader has as much potential of success as the most experienced analyst  if he can control his emotions and behave logically.
To apply this strategy we must first be aware of the existence of a  trend. Without identifying a trend we would be gambling, and that’s not  the purpose of trading forex. Both fundamental and technical analysis  can be employed for identifying a trend, and both of them have their  advantages and drawbacks. It is in general a good idea to use a  combination of them for deciding on the trend’s character, and deciding  on our entry and exit points.
From here, let us use the dialogue between the successful trader and  the beginner in order to explain the principles in an easier way.
B: I want to use the trend following method. How do I do it?
ST: You must first choose whether you want to employ technical or  fundamental analysis for your method, or a combination of both.
B: Is there a difference between these methods?
ST: Yes. Fundamental analysis can provide you with information which  can predict the strength and length of a trend., while technical  analysis can show you how it develops. It is possible to base your  strategy on one of these to the exclusion of the other, and it is still  possible to turn a profit if you are lucky enough, but our principle has  always been to reduce the role of luck to as little as possible.  Fundamental analysis is more reliable than technical analysis in  defining a trend that has long term potential, but without technical  analysis it would be extremely difficult to decide when or how to trade.  Technical analysis can suggest the beginning of a trend, but it’s  unlikely to tell much about the length or strength of the same. Thus, I  suggest that you use both technical and fundamental methods for your  trend following strategy, with fundamental factors eliminating the false  signals of technical analysis, and technical tools providing you with a  time-price frame for deciding on entry points.
B: How do I decide on the existence of a trend?
ST: There are many technical tools that can signal the phenomenon,  but there are an equal number of false signals generated by them.  Remember that there are only three kinds of trends that can exist at any  time: flat, up or down, and it is possible to speak of trends between  any two points on a price chart. Simply take two random points on a  chart, draw a moving average on it, and the pattern that arises can be  analyzed as a trend. Thus it is always necessary to have at least a  basic of understanding of the economic factors that can create trends,  before deciding on the validity of a chart pattern.
B: And how do I do that?
ST: Familiarize yourself with the big picture; understand what drives  market participants; recognize the stage of the business cycle.
B: What kind of price pattern will create a trend?
ST: The trend that we seek to trade is different from random  fluctuations, range patterns and similar price movements in that the  price itself, in the absence of any technical indicator, can still be  recognized as showing a trend. In other words, there is some driving  conviction behind the price action which allows the trader to easily  identify it visually. Depending on the type of the trend (that is, an  up- or downtrend), successive highs and lows should constitute a rising  or falling pattern, with relatively few irregularities. But such a case  is often a rarity, and the trader will have to back his technical  patterns with conviction that can perhaps only be gained through  fundamental analysis.
B: If the trend can be identified visually, why use technical tools?
ST: Even though we can notice the existence of a trend, we still need technical tools to trade it, and time it.
B: So will you try time the market? I’m told that never works.
ST: Market timing never works when one is trying to predict reversal  points on a technical basis. However market timing in the context of a  trend, with the purpose of picking the counter-trend extremes, and using  them to enter a trade, is necessary and profitable. And there lies the  main principle of a trend following strategy: recognize the trend,  identify counter-trend moves, and use them to enter a trade in the  direction of the trend.
B: In a sense, then, you’re behaving as a contrarian of short scale moves, and the follower of the long-term trend
ST: Yes. Indeed, there lies the soul and spirit of all trading. To  utilize short-term irrational behaviors of the market in order to enter  into long-term positions in positive alignment with fundamentals (or,  sometimes just the trend), is the core of all successful trading.
B: How long should the trend follower maintain his position?
ST: Forever, or to be exact, for as long as the fundamental reasons  that back the trend are dominant. If the trader cannot identify those  reasons, if he’s unwilling to do so, or if he doesn’t believe, for some  unfathomable reason, that they are useful, he can use technical patterns  to time his exit point. Even if the trader is aware of the fundamental  factors, and is able to evaluate them correctly, technical analysis can  still provide him with a very useful early warning system. If the price  action is suggesting strongly that there’s some error in the trader’s  fundamental outlook, he can use the technical signals as an occasion to  reevaluate and reexamine his fundamental picture.
B: How do I time my trade with technical analysis?
ST: The best tools for trend following are supplied by moving  averages and simple price charts. Bar charts, candlesticks and many  others can be equally useful if employed with moving averages. For  example, between October 2007 and April-May 2008, the price action of  USD/SGD always remained below the 100-day moving average. When the  pattern broke down, in June of the same year, the trend had also broken  down, and the price went on to break the 200-day average, and a  medium-term upward trend was established. It is also possible to use  moving average crossovers, and myriad other methods, but whichever you  choose to use, you should ensure that you do not complicate the main  aspect of your strategy, which is trend following.
B: Which time frame do you recommend for the moving average?
ST: If you want to trade on a weekly or daily basis, the 100-day MA  will probably be able to capture most of the important trends for you.  Anything with a longer period is likely to be meaningless because of too  much data discarded , and any time frame that is too much below the  100-day period may be too sensitive to price action. But as usual, one  can use other timeframes below 100, provided that he doesn’t clutter his  screen with lots of indicators, charts, tools.
B: When trend following, where should I place my stop-losses and take profit orders?
ST: This partly depends on the term and nature of your trend  following method. A stop-loss order can be placed a short distance above  or below the trend line, whether it is provided by the moving average,  or a simple line drawn on the chart. In our opinion, the trend follower  should not realize his profits until he has a good reason to do so. The  purpose of this strategy is to focus on underlying price dynamics by  stripping out volatility and short term movements, and there is little  logic to realizing profits in response to fluctuations which are  irrelevant to the main action of the trend.
B: But I still have to take profit at some point. Where should I do that?
ST: Go as far as the trend goes, then stop. There you can take profits.
B: How do I know how far it goes?
ST: As we just explained, you can use the MAs to decide on that, but  it’s far better to identify the fundamental causes behind a trend, and  then to exit the trade once those causes are eliminated.
To sum it up, we can repeat that trend following is the easiest and  most straightforward way of making money in the forex market. But  successful trading requires the foresight provided by analysis and the  patience that only comes with confidence. Those of us who prefer quick  profits and instant ratification will find the method uninspiring, but  it is reliable and will work wonders if you give it the chance.
 
 
 
That high leverage is dangerous is well-known to most people, but it  is not unusual to make spectacular profits with a highly leveraged  account, just as it is not unusual to throw three heads in a row during a  coin-tossing competition. The sad fact is that even those spectacular  profits are highly likely to be wiped out if the trader continues to  make bets utilizing high leverage, as we examined in the previous  articles on gambling strategies in forex. The inability of the trader to  get rid of high leverage after a bout of successful trades is related  to a concept called the “gambler’s conceit”. The gambler’s conceit is  not caused by high leverage only, but we will limit our discussion of  this subject to high leverage since it’s so common among traders.
Many of us have that genie beside our ears who whispers to us all the  time that risking too much is not a problem because we are wise enough  to exit a risky bet while still running profits. High leverage may be  wrong, undercapitalization may be dangerous, but our trades have so far  been profitable, and as soon as the profits diminish or losses are being  registered, we will close our positions, and exit the game, be it  gambling with cards or gambling with forex.
It's very convincing. After all, why would one want to risk losing  the profits of such a risky practice as high leverage? What is the point  of continuing to practice a losing strategy even after your profits  have been halved by a string of losses?
Many beginning traders who make a lot of money randomly in the forex  market in a short period of time are convinced that it is their method,  style, attitude that makes those large profits possible. On the other  hand, the experience and knowledge possessed by a trader at the start of  his career is insufficient for practicing self-control or employing  money management methods successfully. Thus, in many cases (but not  always), the doubling, or tripling of the account of a new trader is  just a chance event, regardless of the rationalizations which the trader  uses to explain his situation. What is more, even in the case of a  highly successful, highly disciplined trader, the occasional very large  profits are not at all a sign of increased efficiency or better  understanding: There’s nothing extraordinary about the occasional  extremes in a trader’s career. Instead of emphasizing them too much, and  thinking about what he did right or wrong to deserve such large profits  or losses, the seasoned trader will evaluate them for what they are:  statistical anomalies on which neither a career, nor a trading strategy  can be based.
The Gambler’s conceit prevents such a rational explanation. Instead  of understanding the gains after highly-leveraged bets as random  developments, the trader ties these results to his own exceptional luck,  skill, or insight in evaluating the market action, or to his superior  trading strategy, and convinces himself that he will be able to  terminate his trading activity due to his controlling power over his  trading results. With such false confidence, when the inevitable large  losses occur he will ponder on what went wrong with his trade, which  indicator, which scheme he needs to revise and refine, instead of  accepting and understanding that gains on highly leveraged bets are  illusory, and unlikely to remain with him permanently. When a peer  confronts him about the unusually high leverage of his trades, and his  irrational expectation that he can keep profiting with such high risks,  he will protest by mentioning his past successes.
In fact, gains on a highly leveraged account have the potential to be  even more destructive than losses. Losses will teach the trader to be  humble, and will lead him to revise his methods. Gains, on the other  hand, will addict him to his errors. Sadly, such an addiction can only  be broken by the pain of a totally wiped-out account sometimes.  Fortunately for you, we’re here to warn you about the dangers associated  with this risky practice.
The best remedy of the gambler’s conceit is avoidance of the  addiction entirely. Instead of consoling yourself that you will give up  the practice once the profits are gone, convince yourself to never begin  the unhealthy game. Do not aim at exceptional results; aim at  consistency. But if you find that you’re already deep into the game of  high leverage and risky practices, our advise to you is to cut it off  right now, without waiting for the losses to show up. Just close the  chapter, quit trading for a while, and a few weeks later, or maybe a  month, restart your career by practicing sane and sensible strategies  this time. Not only will you find intellectual satisfaction at having  overcome a dangerous addiction, you will also have a profitable path  before yourself as you improve your skills, recognize your errors.
To repeat, brief periods of enormous profits is never the purpose of a  successful trader. Such periods are always temporary, and the false  confidence that becomes instilled your psyche is often destructive to  your career as a trader: aim at consistent profits, do not aim at high  very high profits.